I often feels that most of teachers pushes their ideas or mainstream theories to students too much. That is negative to younger generations in terms of bringing breakthroughs to the world. Even though knowing and understanding what has been researched or what the world has experienced so far is important, those who teaching should not push the conventional paradigm to students. The explanation of teachers/professors is a good opportunity to learn, but forcing students to think in conventional ways is not welcomed.

Also, classes without insightful analysis or critical thinking of professors are not interesting. They are just following the superficial mainstream ideas and their classes are not attractive. It doesn’t stimulate intellectual curiosity and less worth taking. They are just pushing assembled date to students. It doesn’t work for students to develop and has some factors preventing creativity and development of students. The information in those class

For example, learners are fascinated by lectures, videos, or books of attractive intellectuals. Until now, I became interested in many fields including sociology and journalism by those people. Words uttered by good professors leads students to study further. They stimulate intellectual curiosity of students. Even the studies students are not interested in, it get students interested.

Many Professors educating students with conventional theories are likely to be obsessed with the existing theories. They always should doubt whether the existing notions work or not in the present or in the future. Always getting out of a framework is a way to develop. That is why professors should not put pressures students to be obedient to what they teach. It doesn’t effectively help students to develop a society.

Today’s commonsense doesn’t work enough in 10 or 20 years which means that just educating to follow conventional knowledge doesn’t help students in the long run.

Good professors are having deep insights, critically think, and develop. Those classes are more valuable for learners.

Upload: 6 April 2019, Last update: 23 April 2019

Recently, France media reported that Gérald Darmanin, the Minister of Public Action and Accounts, suggested the possibility of abolishing the current TV fee system.

The Minister mentioned it on BFMTV on 29 March 2019[1].

Although the system is not the completely same, this type of topic related to TV fees has been controversial in Japan. People are increasingly leaving TV by diversified ways of getting information in daily life.

NHK is the TV station demands to pay the fees in Japan. In France, the revenue paid by more than 27 million households whose total is 3.8 billion euros is divided to 7 companies including France Télévisions and Radio France[2].

As time passes, the conventional mediums are changing to others. It needs the conventional media to change the way of raising funds. Japan’s conventional way has to be changed, or more and more people would have complaints.

[1] https://www.francetvinfo.fr/politique/gerald-darmanin/audiovisuel-public-la-fin-de-la-redevance-est-elle-faisable_3256507.html Accessed 5 April 2019

[2] http://www.lefigaro.fr/economie/le-scan-eco/dessous-chiffres/redevance-tv-ce-que-paient-nos-voisins-europeens-20190329 Accessed 5 April 2019

Upload: 30 March 2019, Last update: 9 April 2019

The definition of Dentou is not completely same as tradition although in the previous article “How a tradition survive, develop, and decline — Japan as an example“, I used tradition as a word of Dentou. Particularly, Japanese society has been putting values on Dentou. I do think that we should respect dentou, but just continuing something cannot keep dentou alive in the future.

Some Japanese people may misunderstand what “Dentou” is. “Dentou” doesn’t mean just persisting in old styles. It has essential values unchanged from the emergence of its custom. “Kanshu” includes more cases of continuity without respects as it sometimes expressed as “ashiki-kanshu” in Japanese meaning impractical custom[1]. Importantly, the values remain in modern days.

When I look at the Japanese society, people continue to do in the same way even if it is not efficient or some people are noticing that it doesn’t work.

The traditional or conventional way is not effective or not valuable in contemporary society, we don’t have to continue. Indeed, this is not dentou. We should change it to more practical style. There’s cases that traditional ways prevents progress and it often can be seen in Japanese society.

“Dentou” has a long history, but it doesn’t mean that everything old they continue is “dentou”. If it doesn’t have values evaluated in modern society, it becomes a piece of history and it has historical value.

The conservative charactaristic of Japanese society puts more emphasis on conventional ways, but it hinders progress and development. It’s sure that there’s many dentou in Japanese society they should preserve, but it should be preserved if it is valuable and evaluated in a society.

Upload: 23 March 2019, Last update: 26 March 2019

At present, diversity is a keyword. In many cases, people use this word when they gain different notions from exterior. However, I recently think that in education or in a society in larger scale, we need to increase diversity internally and it can help develop a society.

In general, diversity can be enhanced when different ideas comes into a society from outside the framework of a society. It can help people to encounter new ideas which stimulates their intelligence and facilitate the development.

In education, it’s basically the same as above. More concretely, universities receiving exchange students are trying to accept more diversities.

Indeed, diversity from outside of a framework is needed and works well, but in the same time, we should encourage the internal diversification.

The current educational system should be changed to the model that encourages personalities and characteristics of each student. Students don’t have to become similar with others. They should notice that difference is more important than similarity in development of a framework. If education can strengthen the strongpoints of each student without imposing limits on their potential, it would enhance diversity in a framework.

This model of education has positive impact on development of a society.

Not just in education, but the internal diversification in a society increases the possibility that a society develops as well.

Some might think that it would be too chaotic, but people develop a society are those who can steadily organize and bring development out of the chaos.

The traditional way of education is now time to change. When it comes to the future development, the current model of education is an obstacle for future development.

Now, Japan has developed enough to change the style of education in order to develop further.

The current way of educating students is preventing certain students who have potential to bring developments and innovations. The current circumstance is forcing everyone to be in the same page and putting more emphasis on obedience. Being obedient in this context is that students are evaluated in a way that they have to follow what teacher explained in class, although what teacher explained in class is not necessarily true or it will be renewed by others as time passed. Most of the cases teachers just following what the mainstream theories of the field of the course without having critical analysis except the teachers, especially a handful of professors, who has insightful analysis and can criticize theories. Future will be renewed by the younger and there’s no need to push the current theories to them although learning the existing ideas is important. What I want to say is that teachers should not push and force students to follow the existing theories. It hinders students from bringing new perspectives to the world.

Students are almost all the cases living in a certain framework, but it cannot bring changes (When I talk about framework, there’s some cases that people inside of the framework can expand it, but in education where teachers limit the range of learning it doesn’t happen since students basically do not get out of the framework teacher decides in the current education system).

What is important is that how we can develop the existing framework meaning that just being obedient to the existing framework doesn’t develop anything. We don’t have to agree with what teacher said and we don’t study for teacher. Also, It doesn’t necessarily mean that getting better evaluation from teacher is the purpose of studying at school. Though we should learn what has been talked historically in the field, values cannot be generated if we just follow it.

Particularly, students who can bring new ideas by themselves or bring ideas from other fields should be evaluated more. They don’t have to agree with the existing theories and even I would say that they should oppose to the idea if they can explain logically and critically based on their solid explanation.

In other words, education should more evaluate students who doubt and opposes the existing theories. This will turn out that more students can critically analyze and propose suggestions for improving the existing theories than just following the mainstream theories. And It would contribute to develop the current established ones.

Right now, Japan where a society has developed and now they are facing the question how they can advance their country, they need to have more flexibility in its education. Encouraging different values, different opinions, and different other things can be a important factor for developments.

If the education forces students to follow the established theories and to lose their personalities which are strongpoints for them, they don’t need to follow it. Having different and unique opinion is more valuable than having the same opinion with others. Having different opinions should be evaluated more than being just obedient in education.

Think of the current educational system, students are evaluated to what extent they follows what teacher explained in class, but we should more focus on different values to expand and develop. Just following the existing ideas within the framework doesn’t make any changes.

Think of the current situation in education and stagnation of Japan’s development, different values should be evaluated more and I wrote this article above.